Bring it On Spartacus
Itís been a long hard week for our Governator. First he had to live with the fact that his own party refused to endorse his budget at the Republican State Convention. Then the new Field Poll was released, showing him vulnerable for an incumbent, with Democratic candidate Phil Angelides tied with him and Democratic candidate Steve Westly with a small lead. So heís doing what any reasonable politician would do after a week like this: going to Ohio to dressed up as a gladiator god to participate (not fight) at the Gracie Fighting Championships pay-per-view event. Good to know that if Maximus ever attacks California Arnold will be able to defend us.
Hahahah oh my gawd this is tooo weird.
Posted by: Vanna | March 03, 2006 at 07:22 PM
Yah - too damned bad he's not participating in the dust-ups. Wouldn't it be knee-slapping fun to see him LITERALLY knocked to the mat!
I guess he's gotta have an adulation fix by absorbing STARE-oids from an adoring audience.
Posted by: Bob K. | March 04, 2006 at 10:42 AM
hey vanna and bob and bill,
"While critics may try to capitalize on the governor's connection, Whalen said, "It's a classic example of bringing up an issue that (California voters) don't care about."
"They're worrying about environment and education," he said, "and not about the governor going to a brawl in Ohio."
yep an opportune time for the competing demo candidates to surprise the repubs by instead of in-fighting, but unifing an attack against the gov for going to ohio" for a "brawl" vs "brawling" for ca's education and environment?
Posted by: california1st | March 05, 2006 at 06:49 AM
another way of saying it, is instead of these two demos spending big bucks infighting for our party's nomination, thus turning away voters, turn their spending bucks against the gov. sure our two demos have perhaps diff solutions to diff issues. surprise the voters and repubs by keeping it civil. the gov's campaigners and us voters see demos care more about voter issues then attacking each other for political gains...great thought? to borrow an expression, why spend more money attacking a wounded dog (gov) that may backlash for sympathy from voters for gov? what a great way to portray our two demo candidates as "statesman?"
Posted by: california1st | March 05, 2006 at 07:07 AM
sorry, not to hog the blog...but an additional thought...suppose if demos follow above, maybe voters will like both demo candidates...and after one is "selected" voters would be very inclined to say, shucks, either is a "great choice." heck, united we are...(finally?)...time to not attack gov, but point out the mistakes gov made...like the appeasement to his "core" right? gov can go back to acting...heck, i do admit i very much like his action movies, but cannot say the same for his govenership.
Posted by: california1st | March 05, 2006 at 08:38 AM
ok, maybe one last comment about gov's ca miscue-leader-less-ship = gov'ship'wreck.
Posted by: california1st | March 05, 2006 at 09:31 AM
Nice site. Check out ours sometime...
grants free money
Posted by: free business grants | April 26, 2006 at 04:16 PM
Nice site. Check out ours sometime...
grants free money
Posted by: free business grants | April 26, 2006 at 04:17 PM